The Assyrian Church of the Virgin Mary, which was destroyed in 2015 by the Islamic State, in the village of Tal Nasri, south of the town of Tal Tamr, northeastern Hasakah province, Syria, Nov. 15, 2019.
Ishtartv.com
- al-monitor.com
Mohammed Hardan,
April 19, 2021
Along the lines of the
inter-Kurdish talks, Syria’s Syriacs and Assyrians appear to be joining hands
in holding an internal dialogue to unify their vision and national discourse in
the country.
A few months ago, three Syriac
Christian groups launched an inter-Syriac dialogue in a bid to unify their national
Syriac and Assyrian discourse and offer a common vision for the future of
Syria.
These groups, which seek to
represent Syriacs and Assyrians politically and constitutionally in Syria,
include the Syriac
Union Party, the Assyrian
Democratic Party — both of which operate under the umbrella of
the Syrian
Democratic Council affiliated with the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic
Forces (SDF) — as well as the Assyrian
Democratic Organization that is affiliated with the National Coalition of Syrian Revolutionary and
Opposition Forces.
According to the
London-based The
New Arab pan-Arab newspaper, the Syriac dialogue appears to be going
the opposite direction of the inter-Kurdish
dialogue, which has been marred with challenges since it was launched,
preventing the Kurdish parties from reaching an agreement. The Syriac dialogue
aims to reach common positions and a clear vision for the future regardless of
the parties’ political affiliations.
Although the Syriac forces
participating in the dialogue have various affiliations — some close to the
Kurds and others to the Syrian opposition — they all agree on
the need to reach a common vision for the good of the country, away from any
interference or mediation by any party.
The dialogue, which kicked off in
January, is ongoing and taking place in Qamishli in the countryside of
Hasakah.
Syriac
Christians belong to the Assyrian ethnicity, which makes up about a
third of Syria's Christians and 4% of the country's total population. They
mainly live in northeastern Syria in the Jazira region, namely in the cities of
Hasakah, Qamishli, Ras al-Ain, al-Malikiyah, Amuda and Tal Tamer. Some of them
are also settled in major cities such as Homs, Aleppo and Damascus. At the
start of the Syrian revolution in 2011, the Syriacs have formed
independent military forces to protect themselves, such as the Syriac Military Council, the
Syriac Security Office (known as Sutoro) and the Khabur Guards, which fought
alongside the SDF.
A member of the Executive
Committee of the Syriac Union Party, who preferred not to be named, told
Al-Monitor, “The parties share the same language, religion and social
traditions, which prompted them to find a common ground in politics too.”
He said, “This is true despite
some challenges related to the fact that the Christian components are
associated with the existing political alliances based on existential reasons
rather than political conviction. Some of these alliances are fully associated
with the policy of the Turkish government, such as the National Coalition to
which the Assyrian Democratic Organization belongs, and whose popularity has
greatly dwindled."
He added that the Syrian
Democratic Council’s popularity is also dwindling in the areas under the SDF
control, amid violations of freedom and democracy. “I believe that any official
rapprochement between Turks and Kurds would be conducive to bring together the
views of the region’s different components and unify the political affiliations
that can be found within the same single component."
Samir Matar, head of the Syrian
Journalists Association and a Christian journalist based in Germany,
told Al-Monitor, “The main reason behind the establishment of this dialogue is
the realization of the majority of Christians that their disassociation policy
during the rule of the Syrian regime and their ensuing marginalization has
greatly harmed the Christians’ interests in general.”
Matar added, “I believe many
Christians realized — albeit a bit late — that it was wrong
to rely on the clergy to defend their social and political interests.”
He does not see any success in
the foreseeable future for these parties that were created on a religious
basis.
“I think their success is
contingent on the future composition in Syria and whether or not the new
constitution would be based on the quota principle, which proved a failure in
both Iraq and Lebanon. Syrians ought to learn from their neighbors with whom
they share a similar religious social composition,” he said.
“I believe Syrians should
distance themselves from the dictations [and interference] of external powers.
Yet it remains difficult to judge these parties — whether they
are politicized or independent — because the ground for party work has not been
laid yet in Syria and the region as a whole is gripped by crises.”
In statements to The New Arab
April 8, Gabriel Moshe Kourieh, head of the relations office of the
Assyrian Democratic Organization, denied
any mediation from third parties in the Syriac dialogue.
“During our meetings with the
Americans [last month], they asked us to follow in the footsteps of the Kurdish
dialogue. We said that our dialogue was proceeding. In later meetings, a few
months after the launch of the dialogue, they offered to mediate. We responded
that we were able to solve our internal problems,” he said.
Al-Monitor tried to reach out to
a member of the Syriac Union Party’s Executive Committee for a statement on
whether or not the dialogue is backed by the United States, but he declined to
comment.
But Anas Shawakh, a researcher at
the Jusoor
Center for Studies, told Al-Monitor, “The Syriac-Assyrian dialogue kicked
off with a push from the United States as was the case with the intra-Kurdish
dialogue.”
He said, “This was confirmed by
our sources within the three Syriac parties, who are unable to make comments in
this regard and wish to show that the reason behind this dialogue is the common
will between the three parties to reach political independence."
Shawakh believes that these
parties are unlikely to succeed in their endeavors since they are affiliated
with opposing sides, unless a Kurdish-Turkish agreement is reached, which is
far-fetched.
“I find that these dialogues are
useless for the region in supporting stability, as long as they are held within
a single component or sect rather than across all religious components.
But these dialogues remain a good step to bring together the different
opposing parties within a community to take the next steps,” Shawakh added.
Wissam Aldien Aloklah, a
professor in the Political Science and International Relations Department
at Mardin
Artuklu University in Turkey, told Al-Monitor, “Internal dialogues
within the same community are necessary to unify their ranks after they have
been divided between the warring parties, especially now amid the political
stalemate and the calm on the fronts — something that would allow these
components to opt for dialogue.”
He said, “Despite the fact that
these dialogues primarily seek to achieve personal gains for the parties
involved — as they would have representation at the international level
and in committees involved in the drafting of the constitution — they
are eventually in the interest of the Syrian people and contribute to reaching
a political solution.”
Aloklah concluded, “The next step
would be to talk with other parties, something that needs more time but can be
successful in the long run."
|